Definition
This legal doctrine excuses contracts when both parties are mistaken about something important. Example: both think the property is 2 acres but it's actually 1 acre.
Not sure where this fits?
Answer a few questions and we’ll open the path that fits, at the right step.
Find my pathAbout this term
Mutual mistake excuses contracts when both parties are wrong about something important. Example: both parties think property is 2 acres; it's actually 1 acre. Both mistaken about material fact (acreage). Mutual mistake differs from unilateral mistake (only one party wrong; generally not excusable). Mutual mistake requires: both parties mistaken, about material fact (not law or value), mistake caused transaction to fail, neither party's fault. Courts strictly interpret mutual mistake: parties bear risk of bad assumptions (if one party researches and other doesn't, no mutual mistake). Mistakes about value (paying too much) aren't excusable: 'I thought it was worth $500k, actually worth $300k' isn't mutual mistake. Mutual mistake is powerful but difficult to prove. Applies to: property acreage, condition, ownership status, legal right to use. Understanding mutual mistake: if both parties discover mistake, might be grounds for rescission.
Pro Tip
If mutual mistake is discovered, document it and contact the other party immediately.
Example
Both parties assume property is zoned commercial; it's actually residential. Mutual mistake about zoning allows either party to rescind contract.